Twitter

Weblog

Papier is geduldig. En zwaar. (00:26)

Vakwerk (3/3) (01-09)

Zie ginds komt de Godwin (31-08)

Vakwerk (2/3) (31-08)

Vakwerk (1/3) (30-08)

Potverdriedubbeltjes, ik ben betrapt! (30-08)

Shock and Awe Advertising, Old Oxford Style (29-08)

Stone Age Theocracy (29-08)

Huishoudelijke mededeling (29-08)

Treescapes (5/5) (27-08)

Reacties

Marieke (31-08, 21:51)

Erik (31-08, 18:49)

Erik (31-08, 18:46)

Suus (31-08, 17:50)

Nanny (30-08, 22:34)

Vroeger

Alles wit (2008)

Werk aan de winkel (2007)

Verslikt (2006)

Bah, emancipatie! (2005)

Ook Pissed? (2005)

Pissed (2005)

Spleetoogboot (2005)

Impact of Miko (2005)







 

Login

We, the Dutch, and Geert Wilders

06-03-10, 18:44

I am going to do this in English, because the people capable of reading Dutch know very well what I think of the man who here in Britain is generally thought to have a serious chance of becoming our next prime minister (Guardian, BBC). Yes, there is serious chance that he will end up conquering twenty-seven or even more seats in parliament, and there is the possibility that his party will be the largest (though, fair to say, we never had a parliament with all parties having less than 30 seats, which is one fifth out of a total of 150). Yet, I personally do not believe the man is going to be our next prime minister, and I think few people, at this point, are believing that.

We are going to have strange elections. Three parties might end up largest: the Christian-Democrats, the Labour Party, and the Freedom Party. Now for both other large parties, the Freedom Party is something of a no-go-area, simply because their voters would not accept a coalition with Wilders, and would run away. The same is true for the Greens party, the Socialist Party and the Liberal Democrats, so that it is completely impossible for Wilders to get involved in a coalition that comes anywhere near 75 seats. That's the good news.

The bad news is that Wilders' ideology of divide and rule has been dominating the debate in Dutch politics for some five years now, and that there is a fair chance of the upcoming elections campaign being dominated by issues about islam and integration, which is not at all helpful for the hard issues that are at stake in the years to come. People will cast their vote based on arguments about the burqa, islamic schools and other completely irrelevant things, without seriously thinking about the future of our national health-care, our school system or our state pension. For me, personally, that is more scary than whether or not Wilders will end up largest. One of the parties that is likely to profit sharply from this is the Liberal Democrats (D66), who will probably conquer a large percentage of the vote because of their leader saying sensible things about Wilders, but who have a socioeconomic agenda that might have far-reaching consequences for our society. Yet, many people will vote for them without even realizing. That, really, is the price to be paid for Geert Wilders. It is not a price of racism, but a price of distortion.

Wilders NL D66
189 hits; 8 reacties; Reageer



Ondertussen in A perfect circle

Guatemala City.
(01-06-10, 12:26; 2 reacties)

Linkdump

Hoe zou de Wilders van 2009 de Wilders van 2010 hebben betiteld? Als een achterkamertjesgeile plucheplakkende principeloze draaikont. (15-04, 21:27)

Dank je, Femke. Zo zit het. (10-04, 11:45)

Vaak gevoerd, de 'conjunctiefdiscussie', maar men neme een paar letters, en men legge hem op het scrabblebord. Leuk stukje. (10-04, 1:19)

Neeeeee GEEN plaatsnamen bij SCRABBLE! (06-04, 12:41)

Democratie in the UK: "eh, oh, and, eh, by the way, now that we are doing fine in the polls, I am happy to let you know that there will be a general election in four weeks" (06-04, 12:39)

Lees ook

Links

Amnesty International

Huffington Post

The Observers

Sargasso

Noorderlog

Peter Flohr

Sjroep

Portfolio Archeologie

Radboud Universiteit

Hello Brother

Facebook

LinkedIn

Twitter

© Miko Flohr 2004-2010